The Economic History Review

How did women count? A note on gender‐specific age heaping differences in the sixteenth to nineteenth centuries1

Volume 65 Issue 1
Home > The Economic History Review > How did women count? A note on gender‐specific age heaping differences in the sixteenth to nineteenth centuries1
Pages: 304-313Authors: PETER FÖLDVÁRI, BAS VAN LEEUWEN, JIELI VAN LEEUWEN‐LI
Published online: February 18, 2011DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0289.2010.00582.x

Log in to access the full article.

The role of human capital in economic growth is now largely uncontested. One indicator of human capital frequently used for the pre-1900 period is age heaping, which has been increasingly used to measure gender-specific differences. In this note, we find that in some historical samples, married women heap significantly less than unmarried women. This is still true after correcting for possible selection effects. A possible explanation is that a percentage of women adapted their ages to that of their husbands, hence biasing the Whipple index. We find the same effect to a lesser extent for men. Since this bias differs over time and across countries, a consistent comparison of female age heaping should be made by focusing on unmarried women.

SHAPE