The Economic History Review

Going multilateral? Financial markets’ access and the League of Nations loans, 1923–8

Volume 69 Issue 2
Home > The Economic History Review > Going multilateral? Financial markets’ access and the League of Nations loans, 1923–8
Pages: 653-678Authors: Juan H. Flores Zendejas, Yann Decorzant
Published online: October 12, 2015DOI: 10.1111/ehr.12126

Log in to access the full article.

Why are international financial institutions important? This article reassesses the role of the loans issued with the support of the League of Nations. These long-term loans constituted the financial basis of the League’s strategy to restore the productive basis of countries in central and eastern Europe in the aftermath of the First World War. In this article, it is argued that the League’s loans accomplished the task for which they were conceived because they allowed countries in financial distress to access capital markets. The League adopted an innovative system of funds management and monitoring that ensured the compliance of borrowing countries with its programmes. Empirical evidence is provided to show that financial markets had a positive view of the League’s role as an external, multilateral agent, solving the credibility problem of borrowing countries and allowing them to engage in economic and institutional reforms. This success was achieved despite the League’s own lack of lending resources. It is also demonstrated that this multilateral solution performed better than the bilateral arrangements adopted by other governments in eastern Europe because of its lower borrowing and transaction costs.