Log in to access the full article.
This article examines the relationship between national politics, sovereign default, credit rationing, and their effects on fiscal revenues and exports in nineteenth-century Colombia. Using quantitative and qualitative analysis, it challenges existing narratives on Colombia’s lack of sustained nineteenth-century export-led development, showing that sovereign default was a political choice with long-term negative impacts. The study highlights how credit rationing and technological backwardness hindered economic growth. It argues that these policies caused Colombia’s economic stagnation, leading to boom-and-bust cycles in export crop production. It identifies substantial growth during the liberal era and minimal growth during the regeneración period.