The Economic History Review

What can we learn from a race with one runner? A comment on Foreman‐Peck and Zhou, ‘Late marriage as a contributor to the industrial revolution in England’

Volume 72 Issue 4
Home > The Economic History Review > What can we learn from a race with one runner? A comment on Foreman‐Peck and Zhou, ‘Late marriage as a contributor to the industrial revolution in England’
Pages: 1439-1446Authors: Jeremy Edwards, Sheilagh Ogilvie
Published online: September 11, 2018DOI: 10.1111/ehr.12785

Log in to access the full article.

Abstract Foreman-Peck and Zhou’s claim that late marriage was a major contributor to the industrial revolution in England cannot be sustained. They consider neither other influences on English industrialization nor other European economies where marriage age was high throughout the early modern period but industrialization came much later. It is not possible to argue that late marriage age was a major contributor to English industrialization without analysing other possible contributing factors. Any consideration of this question must assess marriage age alongside other causes of industrialization and explain why other European economies with a higher marriage age industrialized much later than England.

SHAPE
Menu